QTheMusic.com

User Comments

Post A Comment

• Definitely not. They must use some other name, because only Queen albums can come from the vaults/archives.

  Posted by ex-fan at 2:39 PM | 02/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• Its Queen + Paul Rodgers...so that is a new name. Good on them.

  Posted by Greg at 4:29 PM | 02/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• Brian and Roger should record an album together and share the vocals themselves.

  Posted by Christian at 9:14 PM | 02/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• How about if the combined both band's names, and call themselves Freen? or Quee?

  Posted by Flash at 11:18 AM | 03/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• queen are nothing without freddy!

  freddy mercury is queen.

  give it up brian and release stuff under a different name.

  Posted by davie at 1:59 PM | 03/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• Freddie was great and Queen will never be the same again but only a quarter of Queen was Freddie so I say rock on boys!

  Posted by phil dalley at 5:26 AM | 05/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• they have every right,but.....without Freddie?that band was the sum of it's parts,even without John Deacon I don't think it could ever be as amazing.

  Posted by neale floyd at 1:33 PM | 05/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• No I do not think they should still use the name Queen, not without Freddie and John. I think it's really disrespectfull.

  Posted by Elisabeth at 3:52 PM | 07/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE! Give it up. Queen died the moment Freddie did. To continue a band as big as Queen without its iconic frontman is just ridiculous. [Can you imagine the Rolling Stones without Mick? Nirvana without Kurt?] The whole idea is to make money as May and Taylor know that far fewer people would buy the album released under a different name. They should be ashamed of themselves. Queen was Freddie and Freddie was Queen. The other 3 were essentially just Freddie's backing band.

  Posted by Martin at 9:48 AM | 08/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• I ´ll listen to the music not to the name.I think they can do a lot of great music, and we all know that Freddie was unique and an incredible genious. That said, let´s wait for the record.

  Posted by Alberto at 11:34 PM | 09/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• Once a legend like Freddy dies any band should give up. It's not as if they have not made enough money. Come on lads enjoy your retirement and live the music making to the youngsters.

  Posted by Donal at 11:16 AM | 13/11/2006 | Report Abuse

• he can he help made the name and he is the new lead band member, we no that queen is only at its best with freddie,they all no that

  Posted by letitia king at 9:29 AM | 05/12/2006 | Report Abuse

• I love Brian and Roger to death. But really now, this has got to stop. At least John Deacon has the decency / sense to remain apart from the the debacle that's been going on since Freddie's death. This is not Queen, it will never be Queen. Go find another name for fuck's sake and quit rolling poor Freddie about in the grave.

  Posted by prakash1 at 6:43 AM | 19/12/2006 | Report Abuse

• why not AC/DC did when bon died and look how good they are

  Posted by me at 1:40 AM | 01/01/2007 | Report Abuse

• No, continue under another name, its not just Freddie that is gone but also John, It often looks like they just cant give it up and use the Queen name because of the weight it carries. The limited success they have both had since Freddie died shows the name Queen died with him. I think John has shown the most respect for Freddie and the other two should follow his lead.

  Posted by Dave Roberts at 3:50 PM | 23/02/2007 | Report Abuse

Post A Comment