News
Guest column - Stretching Time at Abbey Road by Recording The Beatles author Brian Kehew
Brian Kehew is co-author (with Kevin Ryan) of Recording The Beatles, a behind-the-scenes look at the making of the Fab Four's records. Ryan and Kehew will be presenting lectures on the long history of Abbey Road studios throughout March, a rare chance for the public to visit inside the legendary studios - see Abbeyroad.com for full details. In a guest column for Q, Kehew lifts the lid on technique develop at the north London studio: tape stretching. Plus win a trip to Abbey Road in this month's Caption Competition.
One of the hallmarks of 1960s music was the psychedelic music era, roughly running from 1965 to 1968, depending on your perspective. Whether you now consider it the coolest music ever made, or the most-dated music of all time - it certainly is a style-period that deserves some attention.
Certainly, it was one of the coolest eras of Beatles music - when they felt free to break beyond the sound of "a band" and create music that could not be done in real time. They'd already done some playing-about with sonics on earlier records; half-speed and double-speed tape recordings - like on the solo to A Hard Day's Night which is actually twice the speed they played it. These tape tricks had been done by experimental composers, and even more mainstream artists, like Les Paul... or Pinky And Perky!
At Abbey Road, these influences came to affect commercial pop music as well. So when The Beatles (and other artists at Abbey Road) began to try to replicate the distorted reality of the psychedelic explorations, they began to use the tape recorders to "stretch" the sound. When tape is speeded up or down (versus normal real-time speed) the pitch changes and the length between events changes. All this means is, the sound becomes lower and slower, or higher and faster. When done subtly, it became a powerful tool to stretch time, to bend reality without really cueing the listener that something odd was happening. In this unique time-stretching, artists found a unique effect that replicated (and sometimes induced!) bizarre distortions of perception... Listen to John Lennon's vocal here in Strawberry Fields Forever.
It has a lazy, hypnotic dragging-through-molasses feeling of altered reality. Yet to most, the clues of this were subtle; people weren't aware this was not the normal Lennon voice they were used to hearing. They did the same trick for the song Rain, where the instruments are slowed and just slightly trippy. And the opposite, hear John's voice is sped up slightly:
It has a silvery helium-infused edge to it. By speeding up the recording, time is stretched in a perceptible way, without being too bizarre. Originally, the makers of the tape machines had only been concerned with perfect linear real-time recording (mainly for classical records), so the more accurate and steady the better. Abbey Road had specially modified their tape machines to play at all sorts of unusual speeds, and this opened up a world of creative sounds for the bands of the era.
This speed-and-time stretching doesn't even cover the other cool tape tricks used for psychedelia. Those staple sounds of tape echoes and tape flanging/phasing really do define the psychedelic era to most. But the subtle speed-changing stuff was inherently effective for creating such purple hazes... and worth pointing out here, as you may not have noticed it before.
Brian Kehew
For more information on the talks and visits to Abbey Road, head to Abbeyroad.com and enter Q's Caption Competition now to win a vist and a set of speakers.
11:08 AM | 08/02/2013
More Photos Of:
Latest News
-
Summer Of The Stones - take a look at the new cover of Q
Here's a preview of the cover of Q324, which hits the shops next Tuesday (28 May)
-
Q&a Omar Rodriguez-Lopez - "Everything's an open book. I only open new doors, I don't close them"
Mars Volta's acrimonious split? The future of At The Drive-In? As he launches new band Bosnian Rainbows the hardcore hero speaks
-
Have you got a question for Biffy Clyro? Cash For Questions
Get your questions in by 4pm on Monday (27 May)
-
Five songs to hear this week - Mount Kimbie, Nick Cave, !!!, Wu-Tang & more
Jamie Skey rounds-up this week's releases and the best new songs that have appeared online in the last seven days... (20 May)
-
Noel Gallagher wins Ivor Novello award, Thom Yorke scores tax documentary, Franz Ferdinand return with new album... Music News Daily
A round-up of all the news, views, interviews and cool music things online today (17 May)
-
Playlist - Parquet Courts "People we want to play gigs with this year"
With their Great Escape show this week (18 May) and further UK dates, the New York punk are in a gig booking mood...
Advertisement
User Comments
Post A Comment
The ability to easily vary the tape speed is possibly the thing I miss most about moving to computer recording. Much fun was to be had by gradually changing the speed during recording, or double tracking with a slight speed offset. All these things are possible in the computer, but the interface and control is rather different, the sound quality not always as good, and such experimentation is perhaps less fun!
Posted by George Shilling at 6:03 PM | 28/02/2013 | Report Abuse
The ability to easily vary the tape speed is possibly the thing I miss most about moving to computer recording. Much fun was to be had by gradually changing the speed during recording, or double tracking with a slight speed offset. All these things are possible in the computer, but the interface and control is rather different, the sound quality not always as good, and such experimentation is perhaps less fun!
Posted by George Shilling at 6:32 PM | 28/02/2013 | Report Abuse
I spoke to numerous vendors at Winter NAMM 2013 about including the ability to do this (hard via clock, soft "in-the box", etc). And each one responded with "but why?" and/or "no one is interested in old Beatles tricks these days." It seemed like they felt providing an advanced technical creativity tool would not provide the one-click instant gratification desired by today's user base and would be too complicated a niche. But you know, I just don't believe that. Musicians still want to experiment. And learn. This article is a testament to that. A true shame that in an age when 4th graders have access to more audio technology than the Beatle ever dreamed of some of the greatest recording techniques are becoming increasingly hard to do...
Posted by Don B. Sundstrom at 7:14 AM | 01/03/2013 | Report Abuse
I spoke to numerous vendors at Winter NAMM 2013 about including the ability to do this (hard via clock, soft "in-the box", etc). And each one responded with "but why?" and/or "no one is interested in old Beatles tricks these days." It seemed like they felt providing an advanced technical creativity tool would not provide the one-click instant gratification desired by today's user base and would be too complicated a niche. But you know, I just don't believe that. Musicians still want to experiment. And learn. This article is a testament to that. A true shame that in an age when 4th graders have access to more audio technology than the Beatle ever dreamed of some of the greatest recording techniques are becoming increasingly hard to do...
Posted by Don B. Sundstrom at 7:23 AM | 01/03/2013 | Report Abuse
I spoke to numerous vendors at Winter NAMM 2013 about including the ability to do this (hard via clock, soft "in-the box", etc). And each one responded with "but why?" and/or "no one is interested in old Beatles tricks these days." It seemed like they felt providing an advanced technical creativity tool would not provide the one-click instant gratification desired by today's user base and would be too complicated a niche. But you know, I just don't believe that. Musicians still want to experiment. And learn. This article is a testament to that. A true shame that in an age when 4th graders have access to more audio technology than the Beatle ever dreamed of some of the greatest recording techniques are becoming increasingly hard to do...
Posted by Don B. Sundstrom at 8:02 PM | 01/03/2013 | Report Abuse
I was formed in the times when the genius was a very important factor for the development of the creativity, mainly in the audio one, because with the little thing that we possessed we should achieve that that we wanted, it was a disaster of connections and inventions with apparatuses of any nature, the method of then, the magnetic tape, with all its limitations, but maybe but flexible, surprisingly we end up dominating it and I am from those that I believe that the analog sound is very superior to the digital one.
Some laboratories have created goods to emulate the analog sound in the digital recordings, but that believes that even this very far from the truth, the same as most of the plg-ins, the process analog of the audio one continues being superior.
It is very certain that the audio digital it has enormous kindness and it has reduced the costs of production which today has millions of homemade studies of good quality thanks to that technology. In my opinion there are digital two wonderful things of the audio that it contributes us the current technology, 1 - to be able to see the drawing of what is recorded. 2 - that the storage system being in hard disk, we can go from 0 to 1000000000 in a click.
Tom Forfor
mousetrap studio
Posted by Tom forfor at 10:13 PM | 01/03/2013 | Report Abuse
I was formed in the times when the genius was a very important factor for the development of the creativity, mainly in the audio one, because with the little thing that we possessed we should achieve that that we wanted, it was a disaster of connections and inventions with apparatuses of any nature, the method of then, the magnetic tape, with all its limitations, but maybe but flexible, surprisingly we end up dominating it and I am from those that I believe that the analog sound is very superior to the digital one.
Some laboratories have created goods to emulate the analog sound in the digital recordings, but that believes that even this very far from the truth, the same as most of the plg-ins, the process analog of the audio one continues being superior.
It is very certain that the audio digital it has enormous kindness and it has reduced the costs of production which today has millions of homemade studies of good quality thanks to that technology. In my opinion there are digital two wonderful things of the audio that it contributes us the current technology, 1 - to be able to see the drawing of what is recorded. 2 - that the storage system being in hard disk, we can go from 0 to 1000000000 in a click.
Tom Forfor
mousetrap studio
Posted by Tom forfor at 10:14 PM | 01/03/2013 | Report Abuse
I spoke to numerous vendors at Winter NAMM 2013 about including the ability to do this (hard via clock, soft "in-the box", etc). And each one responded with "but why?" and/or "no one is interested in old Beatles tricks these days." It seemed like they felt providing an advanced technical creativity tool would not provide the one-click instant gratification desired by today's user base and would be too complicated a niche. But you know, I just don't believe that. Musicians still want to experiment. And learn. This article is a testament to that. A true shame that in an age when 4th graders have access to more audio technology than the Beatle ever dreamed of some of the greatest recording techniques are becoming increasingly hard to do...
Posted by Don B. Sundstrom at 8:58 AM | 02/03/2013 | Report Abuse
Note: The server "errors" when posting here leading us to believe nothing posted. So we try again. That's why there are multiple posts of the same thing per author. Still, a great article and a great site.
Posted by Don B. Sundstrom at 2:37 AM | 04/03/2013 | Report Abuse
Post A Comment